A before and after is lost on the shoot, not in the edit
The reason most pairs read as dishonest has almost nothing to do with editing. The second photograph was taken from a slightly different place: a step closer, a hand lower, a different lens, a different hour of the afternoon. A viewer never analyses any of that. They just feel that something moved that you did not move, and the work stops being believable even though neither frame was retouched.
There are only so many ways for that feeling to get in, and they are physical rather than aesthetic. Every one of them is something you can rule out before you press the shutter the second time.
- 1The light changed
- 2The distance changed
- 3The lens changed
- 4The pose or the expression changed
- 5The background moved
- 6The crop or the ratio differs
- 7The before was staged worse than it needed to be
- The fix for each one →
















